From Battle To Birds: Drones Get Second Life Counting Critters

The U.S. Geological Survey is trying to put retired military drones to work in the areas of environmental and wildlife management. So earlier this month, they spent three days counting sage grouse in rural Colorado. Next up: surveys of pygmy rabbit habitat and counting mule deer in Nevada.

The U.S. military and law enforcement agencies have seen increased public scrutiny on the domestic use of the robotically-piloted planes known as "drones." Working on the sidelines of this debate, the U.S. Geological Survey, has been trying to find a second life for retired military drones in the areas of environmental and wildlife management. Instead of watching the battlefield, these drones are watching birds.

Earlier this month, scientists spent three days flying a small four-pound Raven A drone above the breeding grounds of the "greater sage grouse," about 120 miles northwest of Denver. USGS hydrologist Chris Holmquist-Johnson says researchers are trying to figure out if they can use the drone to capture photo and thermal images of the birds without disturbing them.

"So far what we've seen is that they really don't seem to be bothered by it," Homquist-Johnson says. "We're able to get that imagery and they don't flush or move on to a new location."

The experiment is part of a larger project. In recent years, the National Unmanned Aircraft Systems Project Office has coordinated with state and federal agencies to use drones to study everything from mountain pine beetle damage in Colorado to documenting bank erosion along the Missouri River in South Dakota.

The USGS also has had previous success with birds, counting Sandhill Cranes in Monte Vista National Wildlife Refuge in southern Colorado. USGS biologist Leanne Hanson says that in in 2011, scientists compared counts from the results of Raven A flights to those of ground observers, and found the flight data accurate enough to switch to using drones exclusively in 2012.

In future years, the practice could save federal agencies money, she says."Our estimates are that it would be a tenth of the cost," Hanson says.

Brian Rutledge, executive director of Audubon Rockies, has been watching the population of sage grouse decline for decades across the West. And while he says he's in favor of any technology that might lead to a more accurate count of the species, he doesn't think any machine can entirely replace human ground observers.

"This is something that gives us eyes in the sky — no pun intended — to find places and creatures that we wouldn't have on record otherwise," he says. "These will give us hints as to where we ought to look, help us understand populations better. They'll never replace somebody with a notebook and a pair of binoculars or a good spotting scope."

So how far can these drone experiments go? Researchers are circumspect about how far the remote planes will advance bird counts.

Holmquist-Johnson says one limitation comes from the lower resolution cameras and sensors in the Raven A. Overall, experiments with drone technology are in the very early stages.

"As systems get better and sensors are better, then we'll be able to do an even better job of the science we're trying to answer," he says.

The USGS office overseeing these drones gets more than a dozen calls a week from other Interior Department units interested in using them. Upcoming experiments include surveying pygmy rabbit habitat in Idaho, counting mule deer in Nevada and a climate change study near Niwot, Colo.

It's a scientific solution for repurposing drones, keeping an eye on our world and wildlife — or even our potatoes.

Copyright 2013 KUNC-FM. To see more, visit http://www.kunc.org.